The investigative committee and the employee’s rights during the investigation

The investigative committee is the instrument of administrative investigation under the Law on the Discipline of State and Public Sector Employees No. 14 of 1991. Without it — except in the narrow case that allows direct questioning — most penalties cannot properly be imposed. The wider framework is on State employee discipline in Iraq.

How the committee is formed

Article 10 requires the minister or the head of department to form a committee of a chair and two members with experience of the work, one of whom must hold a first university degree in law. A defect in that composition, or the absence of the legally trained member, is often raised on appeal, because the court looks first at whether the procedure was sound.

A mere order forming the committee is not usually challenged if it has not yet affected the employee’s legal position, but a recommendation built on a committee formed contrary to the text may fall, and so may what followed it. Impartiality is required: it is unsound for a person who was a party to the incident, or who will impose the penalty, to sit on the committee. The detail of any bar is read from the principles settled by the Court of Employees’ Judiciary (Mahkamat Qada’ al-Muwazzafin) and from the facts of the file.

What the committee does

The investigation is written. The committee may hear the employee and witnesses, inspect documents it considers necessary, and, where needed, attend and inspect the place. It then draws up a minute of what it has done and heard, with reasoned recommendations: that the employee not be held to account and that the investigation be closed; that one of the Article 8 penalties be imposed; or — a separate line — that the employee be referred to the Court of Investigation, and then the Court of Misdemeanors or the Criminal Court according to the nature of the act if the act appears to be a crime arising from the post or committed in an official capacity.

The exception in Article 10, Fourth, allows the minister or head of department, after questioning the employee, to impose a written reminder, a warning or a salary deduction directly, without a full committee. Questioning is a safeguard, and in sound practice it is written, so that the defence can be proved. Heavier penalties are not analogised to this exception.

The employee’s rights during the investigation

The aim of the investigation is to establish or to negative responsibility. The employee is therefore confronted with the allegation, summoned, and given time to prepare a defence, and the employee or a lawyer may, within the law, inspect the investigation papers and the service file. Writing protects both the administration and the employee: what is not recorded is hard to rely on later before the Court of Employees’ Judiciary.

A failure to appear after proper service does not necessarily stop the committee; it may be recorded in the minute. A legitimate excuse is assessed, and is neither assumed nor dismissed in the abstract.

If the referring official finds the minute incomplete, the papers may be returned for completion.

The committee’s minute records what is attributed to the employee, the statements it has heard, and its reasoned recommendation that the investigation be closed or that one of the penalties set out in the law be imposed.

Where the recommendation goes

The minute is sent up to the official who referred the employee. That official may approve, mitigate, or return the papers to fill a gap, and should not turn the committee into a tool for signing what was never examined. If a job-related crime appears in the act, the committee must recommend referral to the courts under Article 10, Third, and the minister or head of department may also have a duty to refer under Article 24. That line is explained in When is a State employee referred to the courts?.

If the investigation ends in a penalty, the next path is Grievance and appeal to the Court of Employees’ Judiciary. If the employee must be kept away from the post during the investigation, the path is Suspension from duty.

The office reviews the composition of the committee, the conduct of the investigation and the rights of defence on the papers: the order forming the committee, the members’ qualifications, what the minute records of confronting the employee and enabling a statement, and then the reasoned recommendation.

Legal basis and sources

1. Law on the Discipline of State and Public Sector Employees No. 14 of 1991
2. Iraqi Official Gazette, issue 3356, 3/6/1991
3. First Amendment Law No. 5 of 2008
4. Second Amendment Law No. 51 of 2012 (Official Gazette, issue 4250, 10/9/2012)
5. Fifth Amendment to the State Shura Council Law, Law No. 17 of 2013
6. State Council Law No. 71 of 2017

Frequently asked questions

Related topics and articles

• 01Disciplinary penalties under the State employee discipline lawDisciplinary penalties in Law No. 14 of 1991, from a written reminder to removal (azl), and how each penalty affects promotion.
• 02Grievance against a disciplinary penalty and appeal to the Court of Employees’ JudiciaryA disciplinary penalty is first challenged by grievance, then appealed to the Court of Employees’ Judiciary under Article 15 of Law No. 14 of 1991.
• 03Suspension from duty (sahb al-yad): when it is ordered and how it affects paySuspension from duty (sahb al-yad) under Articles 16 to 19 of Law No. 14 of 1991: when it is ordered, how long it lasts, and half pay.
• 04The Court of Employees’ Judiciary and the Administrative Judiciary CourtThe Court of Employees’ Judiciary hears disciplinary penalty appeals; the Administrative Judiciary Court hears other administrative decisions.
• 05Service disputes: promotion, increment and transferDisputes over promotion, increment and transfer of a State employee: when the matter is a service issue, not a disciplinary penalty.

Always check the text in force and its amendments in the official source.

To ask about your matter