The Supreme Administrative Court in Iraq: the challenge and the time limit
The Supreme Administrative Court hears cassation within 30 days of notification or deemed notification, under the amended Article 7.
Read →If a disciplinary penalty is imposed on a State employee, an appeal is not filed with the court on the same day. The Law on the Discipline of State and Public Sector Employees No. 14 of 1991, after the 2008 amendment, requires a grievance to the authority that issued the decision, then an appeal to the Court of Employees’ Judiciary within a written time limit. Missing either limit makes the decision final, within the terms of the text.
Read this with State employee discipline in Iraq and Disciplinary penalties.
Article 15, as amended by Law No. 5 of 2008, requires the employee to file a grievance against the penalty decision with the authority that issued it, within thirty days running from the date the decision is served on the employee. That authority must decide the grievance within thirty days of filing. If the period ends with no decision, the silence is treated as a refusal by operation of the law.
Service of the decision is the key to the time limit. A decision that has not been served does not start the period correctly, and service whose date cannot be proved turns the file into a formal dispute before the merits are reached. The notice of service, or whatever stands in its place, should be kept.
In practice the grievance identifies the decision, the date of service, and the grounds of objection, and it is filed with the same authority that imposed the penalty, not with another body by mistake.
After an express refusal, or a refusal that the law implies from silence, the appeal is filed within thirty days of the employee being served with that refusal. The thirty-day (inside Iraq) and sixty-day (outside Iraq) limit in Article 7(9)(b) of the State Shura Council Law, as amended, applies to claims for rights arising under the Civil Service Law, not to claims against disciplinary penalties. The body named “the General Discipline Council” in the 2008 text was replaced by the Court of Employees’ Judiciary under the Fifth Amendment to the State Shura Council Law, Law No. 17 of 2013. The State Council Law No. 71 of 2017 then transferred those courts to the State Council after the change of name.
The court hears objections to Article 8 penalties after the grievance has been completed. It may uphold the decision, reduce the penalty, or set it aside. In this path the court has regard to the Code of Criminal Procedure insofar as it is compatible with the discipline law, and the sittings are in private, as the text provides.
A decision that is not the subject of a grievance, or is not appealed within the time limits, is final. A judgment of the Court of Employees’ Judiciary may be challenged in cassation before the Supreme Administrative Court within thirty days of notification or deemed notification; a judgment not challenged is final and binding (Article 7(9) of State Shura Council Law No. 65 of 1979 as amended by Law No. 17 of 2013, applied to the State Council by Article 2 of Law No. 71 of 2017).
The court generally begins with form: the time limit, the appellant’s standing, whether the grievance was completed, whether the official who imposed the penalty had power to do so, and whether the investigative committee was properly formed if the decision rests on it. It then turns to the alleged breach and whether the penalty is proportionate to what was proved.
This path is not a criminal case before an investigating judge, a misdemeanour court or a felony court. It is also not a general action to annul an administrative decision before the Administrative Judiciary Court (Mahkamat al-Qada’ al-Idari), unless the decision falls outside a disciplinary penalty. The distinction is on The Court of Employees’ Judiciary and the Administrative Judiciary Court. Defence rights before the decision is issued are on The investigative committee.
How time is counted is a matter of applying the text and the practice that has settled before the Court of Employees’ Judiciary. The date is counted from the notice of service and is shown to a lawyer together with the calendar.
The text treats silence during the thirty days as a deemed refusal and opens the appeal period from that date. A later express refusal may overlap with that deemed refusal; the dates of filing and of service of the later refusal are what settle the point.
Article 15 speaks of an objection to decisions imposing the penalties set out in Article 8, after the grievance. What falls within the court’s jurisdiction is read from the text in force and from the approach of the Court of Employees’ Judiciary, not from an unofficial list.
The office follows the calculation of time and the proper forum from the papers of service and grievance under Article 15 of Law No. 14 of 1991: a grievance before the issuing authority, then an appeal to the Court of Employees’ Judiciary within its time limit.
The Supreme Administrative Court hears cassation within 30 days of notification or deemed notification, under the amended Article 7.
Read →A grievance is required before filing in the Administrative Judiciary Court: 30 days from notification, 30 days to decide, then 60 days to claim.
Read →Under the State employee discipline law, an investigation may stay in the department, or lead to referral if the act appears to be a job-related crime.
Read →