When is a State decision challenged before the Administrative Judiciary Court?
Final administrative decisions, not disciplinary penalties, go to the Administrative Judiciary Court. Time limits: Article 7 of Law 65/1979 as amended.
Read →State employees and official discipline
The Court of Employees’ Judiciary and the Administrative Judiciary Court
In briefBoth courts sit under the State Council, but their jurisdictions are not the same. An Article 8 penalty is challenged before the Court of Employees’ Judiciary after a grievance; another administrative decision is generally taken to the Administrative Judiciary Court, unless a special text sends it elsewhere.
The Court of Employees’ Judiciary (Mahkamat Qada’ al-Muwazzafin) and the Administrative Judiciary Court (Mahkamat al-Qada’ al-Idari) both sit under the State Council, but their jurisdictions are not the same. Filing in the wrong court can put the appeal in the wrong place and may lose a time limit.
This page belongs to State employee discipline in Iraq. Read it with Grievance and appeal to the Court of Employees’ Judiciary and Challenging State administrative decisions.
What the Court of Employees’ Judiciary hears
The Court of Employees’ Judiciary replaced the General Discipline Council, under the Fifth Amendment to the State Shura Council Law, Law No. 17 of 2013, and then took its place within the State Council under Law No. 71 of 2017. It hears appeals against disciplinary penalty decisions after the grievance required by Article 15 of the Law on the Discipline of State and Public Sector Employees No. 14 of 1991. It also hears public-service disputes that the text places in its jurisdiction — some disputes over service, appointment and official rights — according to the State Council legislation and the court’s settled practice.
It is a court for the employee’s dispute with the department over the official position. It is not a criminal court. It does not impose imprisonment, and it does not stand in for an investigating judge.
What the Administrative Judiciary Court hears
The Administrative Judiciary Court hears, in general terms, challenges to final administrative decisions issued by public authorities, except where a special text sends the matter to another court. A person who objects to an administrative decision that is not a disciplinary penalty — a refused application, the withdrawal of a leave, or a regulatory decision that affects a legal interest — first asks: does this decision belong to the Administrative Judiciary Court, to the Court of Employees’ Judiciary, or to a third body?
Time limits and any prior grievance on this path are set by Article 7(7) of State Shura Council Law No. 65 of 1979 as amended (a grievance within 30 days, then a challenge within 60 days of refusal). They are not necessarily the thirty-day periods written in Article 15 of the discipline law, even if the numbers sometimes look similar. A time limit is not carried from one statute to another by analogy without a text.
How the right door is chosen
The subject of the decision matters more than the department’s name alone. If the decision is an Article 8 penalty, the usual path is a grievance and then the Court of Employees’ Judiciary. If it is another administrative decision that affects a legal position and does not fall within that special jurisdiction, the Administrative Judiciary Court is considered. If the act is a crime, the path is criminal, before an investigating judge and then a misdemeanour or felony court — a third, separate door.
A mistake as to the forum may lead to a dismissal on form. The decision is therefore read against the text before the forum is chosen. The choice of court and the time limit are read from the decision, the notice of service, and the description of the decision in the text in force.
Legal basis and sources
- Law on the Discipline of State and Public Sector Employees No. 14 of 1991
- Iraqi Official Gazette, issue 3356, 3/6/1991
- First Amendment Law No. 5 of 2008
- Second Amendment Law No. 51 of 2012 (Official Gazette, issue 4250, 10/9/2012)
- Fifth Amendment to the State Shura Council Law, Law No. 17 of 2013
- State Council Law No. 71 of 2017
- State Shura Council Law No. 65 of 1979, as amended
Frequently asked questions
Is a further appeal from the Court of Employees’ Judiciary filed in the Administrative Judiciary Court?
That is not to be assumed. An appeal against a judgment of the Court of Employees’ Judiciary has its own forum and time limit in the State Council legislation, distinct from an originating annulment claim before the Administrative Judiciary Court.
If a disciplinary penalty and another administrative decision appear in one file?
Each decision is examined on its own: its source, its description, and the court that has jurisdiction over it. Combining them in one petition without a clear legal basis puts the form at risk.
The State Council houses these courts under one roof, but one roof is not one jurisdiction. A person who enters by the wrong door may leave with a rejection, and may then have to recalculate the time limit before the correct door, if it is still open. The distinction is applied to the particular decision: its issuing body, its subject-matter, and the date of notification. On the employees’ path the time limit is read from Article 15 of the discipline law after the grievance; on the general administrative path it is read from Article 7 of State Shura Council Law No. 65 of 1979 as amended.
Related topics and articles
- 01Grievance against a disciplinary penalty and appeal to the Court of Employees’ JudiciaryA disciplinary penalty is first challenged by grievance, then appealed to the Court of Employees’ Judiciary under Article 15 of Law No. 14 of 1991.
- 02Service disputes: promotion, increment and transferDisputes over promotion, increment and transfer of a State employee: when the matter is a service issue, not a disciplinary penalty.
- 03Disciplinary penalties under the State employee discipline lawDisciplinary penalties in Law No. 14 of 1991, from a written reminder to removal (azl), and how each penalty affects promotion.
- 04The investigative committee and the employee’s rights during the investigationHow an investigative committee is formed under Article 10 of Law No. 14 of 1991, the employee’s rights, and when referral to the courts is recommended.
- 05Suspension from duty (sahb al-yad): when it is ordered and how it affects paySuspension from duty (sahb al-yad) under Articles 16 to 19 of Law No. 14 of 1991: when it is ordered, how long it lasts, and half pay.
The Supreme Administrative Court in Iraq: the challenge and the time limit
The Supreme Administrative Court hears cassation within 30 days of notification or deemed notification, under the amended Article 7.
Read →Grievance against an administrative decision in Iraq
A grievance is required before filing in the Administrative Judiciary Court: 30 days from notification, 30 days to decide, then 60 days to claim.
Read →