Injury worsened after the decision: what are the options?
Injured in a terrorist operation and the injury worsened after the compensation decision? When to request reconsideration and what papers it takes.
Read →In the file of a person injured in a terrorist operation, the disability percentage is the figure on which most of what is due to the injured person is built. This percentage is not estimated by the injured person, the treating doctor or the sub-committee. It is set by a decision of the official medical committee, which states that the injury caused by the operation resulted in partial or total disability and fixes its extent. So in every injury file the office starts with one question: do you have a medical committee report, and what exactly does it say?
The general framework is on the Compensation for People Injured in Terrorist Operations page.
Article 2 of Law No. 20 of 2009 lists among compensable damage "total or partial disability on the basis of a report of an official medical committee", and "injuries and other conditions requiring temporary treatment", also on the medical committee's report. Physical harm therefore enters the file only through this report. Other reports, such as that of the hospital that first received the injured person, are valuable in proving the date and nature of the injury, but they do not replace the medical committee's decision on the percentage.
Instructions No. 4 of 2018 set out what this decision must say: the medical committee issues a decision for the injured citizen stating that the injury caused by war operations, military errors or terrorist operations resulted in partial or total disability, and fixing the disability percentage.
Before the report is submitted to the sub-committee or the ministry committee, the office checks:
A conflict between the medical report and the investigation papers is one of the most common causes of delay, because the committee will not build on documents that contradict each other.
The Law ties kinds of entitlement to the degree of disability, and as a general rule a higher percentage opens wider rights. Examples from the 2020 amendment:
Turning the percentage into an amount is read from the article applicable to the injured person's status, and the calculation has changed with successive amendments to Law No. 20 of 2009.
Yes, in two situations:
Many applicants ask how to "object to the medical committee's decision". A challenge to the medical report itself follows a route set by the legislation on medical committees in the Ministry of Health, such as referral to an appellate medical committee where applicable, and it is separate from the objection to the compensation decision before the Central Committee. The office keeps the two apart because confusing them wastes time: the objection to a sub-committee decision before the Central Committee must be filed within sixty days from the day after notification and rests on new documents, and a new medical report may be one of them. Time limits are gathered in Time limits in compensation files.
The office reviews the medical report and the investigation papers together before filing, determines whether the file is complete with them or calls for a further report, follows the file before the sub-committee or the ministry committee, and studies the decision once issued to see whether the percentage it adopted matches the report. Determination of the disability percentage is a medical question for the official medical committee under the law and the instructions in force.
The medical committee to which the sub-committee or the ministry committee refers the injured person. The Law requires its report to establish total or partial disability.
Not necessarily. The 2020 amendment provides an injury bonus for those whose disability is 29% or less, calculated according to the degree of disability.
The hospital report proves the injury and its date, but the disability percentage is set by the medical committee's decision.
Because the Instructions require the National Pension Authority to request a re-examination of the injured person every five years to reassess pension rights.
Injured in a terrorist operation and the injury worsened after the compensation decision? When to request reconsideration and what papers it takes.
Read →Injury compensation under Law No. 20 of 2009: claims usually go to the sub-committee, which examines the incident link and the medical report.
Read →General practical scenarios under Law 20 of 2009, as amended: missing documents, a deed of death, a timely objection, a transfer, and payment priority.
Read →