Injury worsened after the decision: what are the options?

The short answer: if a compensation decision was issued on a certain disability percentage and your health then deteriorated because of the same injury, you may ask the committee to reconsider its decision. Law No. 20 of 2009, as amended, requires the committees to reconsider at the request of an injured person whose condition has worsened as a result of the terrorist act, on two conditions: the injury must be established by the first medical committee report, and the worsening must be supported by a recent report from the medical committee. This route is separate from an objection and is not tied to the sixty-day period.

The article sets out the path for asking the committee to reconsider its decision when the medical condition has worsened after the first decision, under Article 6 (Seventh) of Law No. 20 of 2009.

First: what counts as worsening?

Worsening means that the health condition caused by the original injury gets worse after the decision is issued: a fracture that did not heal as expected and led to impaired movement, shrapnel left in the body that caused complications, or an eye injury with sight declining over time. The test is that the deterioration is a continuation of the same injury that was compensated, not a new illness unrelated to it.

That is the first question the medical committee asks: is the current condition the result of the injury documented in the first report? If that link is not established, a reconsideration request does not stand, however much the condition has deteriorated.

Second: reconsideration is not an objection

Many people confuse the two routes, and the difference is fundamental:

• An objection is filed with the Central Committee against a decision of the sub-committee or ministry committee, within sixty days from the day after notification, on the basis of new documents or papers. Its reason is usually a disagreement with the decision as issued.
• Reconsideration because of worsening is filed after the health condition has actually changed, and its reason is an event after the decision, not an error in it. That is why the objection period does not govern it.

So if the decision was issued on a percentage you consider lower than the reality on the day it was issued, your route is an objection within its period, explained on the page Objection and challenge before the Administrative Judiciary Court. If the percentage was right at the time and the condition got worse afterwards, your route is reconsideration.

Third: what papers does the request rest on?

Instructions No. 4 of 2018 regulate the procedure for this request, and require the medical committee to issue a decision stating that the injury caused by war operations, military errors or terrorist operations resulted in partial or total disability, and fixing the disability percentage. The recent report must follow the same form to be relied on.

Fourth: what happens after filing?

The committee refers the injured person to the medical committee for re-examination, then reviews its decision in light of the new report. The outcome may be:

• an amended decision on the new percentage, if the worsening and its link to the injury are established;
• the decision kept as it is, if the worsening or its link is not established;
• a move to a different category, if the new percentage crosses a threshold to which the Law attaches other consequences. The Law as amended distinguishes between disability of not less than seventy-five per cent and lower levels, and between injuries of no more than twenty-nine per cent and those above.

Because the new decision is itself a committee decision, it may in turn be objected to before the Central Committee within sixty days from the day after notification.

Fifth: periodic re-examination may come from the other side

The injured person is not the only one who can move the disability file. Instructions No. 4 of 2018 require the National Pension Authority to request a re-examination of the injured person by the medical committees every five years, to reassess pension entitlements in light of the disability percentage. That examination may end with the same percentage or a different one, higher or lower.

So a person whose condition has worsened does well to have the medical file in order before any periodic examination: it is a chance to show the worsening on paper, and it may also reveal an improvement that affects the entitlement.

Sixth: how to prepare before filing a worsening request

1. Keep a certified copy of the first medical committee report. It is the cornerstone; without it, it is hard to prove that the current condition continues the original injury.
2. Put the treatment records in date order. Visits, operations, scans and tests between the two reports show the medical committee how the condition developed.
3. Do not mix a new injury with the old one. If you suffered another illness or accident unrelated to the terrorist act, mentioning it may matter for the examination, but it is not part of the worsening.
4. Check the details of the earlier decision. Name, decision number, date and disability percentage; any clerical error in them is dealt with first.
5. Ask which body issued the first decision. If you are an employee, it may have come from the ministry committee rather than the sub-committee, and the request goes to the body that issued the decision.

Seventh: questions injured people often ask

Does a worsening reconsideration request have a deadline?

The text does not tie it to the objection period, because it rests on a later event: the worsening of the condition. But a long delay weakens proof of the link between the current condition and the original injury.

Does worsening necessarily mean more compensation?

No. Reconsideration means the committee looks at its decision again in light of a recent medical report, and the outcome depends on what the examination establishes.

I am an employee and my decision came from the ministry committee. Where do I file?

With the body that issued the decision, that is the committee of the ministry or of the entity not attached to a ministry.

The new decision was issued and I disagree with it. What can I do?

The new decision may be objected to before the Central Committee within sixty days from the day after notification, then challenged before the Administrative Judiciary Court.

Can my percentage go down at the periodic examination?

Yes. The five-yearly examination reassesses the condition as it is, and may reveal an improvement as well as a worsening.

Special situations injured people ask about

The first medical committee report was lost

The first report is normally kept in the compensation file with the committee that issued the decision, and a copy may be in the pension file at the National Pension Authority. The first step is to request a certified copy from the body holding the file, not to start a new examination. Without that report, it is hard for anyone to compare the old condition with the current one.

The injured person was an employee and retired after the decision

A change in employment status does not change the body that issued the first decision, but it may change the effect of the new percentage on the entitlement, because the Law distinguishes in some provisions between employees and others, and between those retired because of the injury and others. So the office reads the employment status both on the day of the request and on the day of the first decision.

The worsening appeared close to the periodic examination

If the periodic examination requested by the National Pension Authority is near, organising the medical papers and presenting them at that examination may be enough to show the change. If it is far off, a reconsideration request remains open. The choice between the two depends on the injured person's condition and papers, not on one rule for everyone.

The original injury has not yet been compensated

If no compensation decision has been issued at all, there is nothing to reconsider. The first claim is filed with the sub-committee or the ministry committee, attaching the most recent medical report describing the condition as it is.

Where the office comes in

The office reads the earlier decision and the first medical report, determines whether the right route is reconsideration or an objection, organises the treatment records to show the link between the condition and the original injury, and follows the request before the committee under an official wakala. The medical assessment itself belongs to the medical committee, not to the lawyer.

For the full framework, see Medical report and disability percentage and Time limits in compensation files.

Legal basis and sources

1. Law No. 20 of 2009 as amended, Article 6, Seventh — Al-Waqai Al-Iraqiya, issues 4140 and 4395
2. Instructions No. 4 of 2018 to facilitate implementation of the Law (Al-Waqai Al-Iraqiya, issue 4516) — Articles 5 and 8
3. Second Amendment Law No. 2 of 2020, amended Article 7, First
4. Law No. 20 of 2009 on Compensation of Those Affected by Military Operations, Military Errors and Terrorist Operations, as amended (Al-Waqai Al-Iraqiya, issues 4140 and 4395).
5. Second Amendment Law No. 2 of 2020 (Al-Waqai Al-Iraqiya, issue 4571)

Frequently asked questions

To ask about your matter