Compensation for those injured in terrorist operations: who hears the claim, and what is examined?
Injury compensation under Law No. 20 of 2009: claims usually go to the sub-committee, which examines the incident link and the medical report.
Read →A file may be opened in the governorate of the incident, after which the family of the martyr, missing person or kidnap victim moves to live in another governorate. Article 6 of Instructions No. 4 of 2018 addresses that move: “the subcommittees in the governorate in which the citizen covered by the law lives are authorised to transfer the compensation file, when necessary, to the governorate in which the family of the martyr, missing person or kidnap victim lives, after obtaining the consent of the Directorate of Martyrs of Victims of War Operations, Military Errors and Terrorist Operations.”
The text sets clear limits. First: the body that decides the transfer is the subcommittee in the governorate where the covered citizen lives — not the applicant alone, by a letter to the new governorate. Second: the transfer is “when necessary”, not merely from a wish to change counters. Third: the destination is the governorate where the family of the martyr, missing person or kidnap victim lives; the wording does not automatically extend the transfer to every type of harm, including property or an injury whose family does not fall within this case, unless another basis exists. Fourth: the consent of the Directorate of Martyrs of Victims in the Martyrs Foundation is a condition. Without it the file remains where it is.
Consent is sought through the subcommittee or by an official approach to the Directorate of which a copy is kept, and the current office address is confirmed through the official site or the governorate diwan. After the transfer, the subcommittee in the new governorate continues the audit, serves the decision or processes the pension file, according to the stage the file had reached at the time of transfer. A decision already issued is not reopened merely because of the transfer, unless the stage still calls for completion or for an objection that remains in time.
Objection and challenge periods are counted from notification, not from the date the file arrives in the new governorate. Sixty days before the central committee from the day after notification, then thirty days before the Administrative Judiciary Court, then thirty days before the Supreme Administrative Court. Anyone who waits for the transfer to be completed until the last day of the period puts the right at risk of lapsing. If payment is made through the governorate under Article 16 of Law No. 2 of 2020, the financial follow-up path may change with a change of the governorate concerned once the decision is ready for payment; that is clarified with the Ministry of Finance and the governorate, and is not assumed automatically.
A transfer is not a substitute for knowing where to file in the first place, nor for the steps in the file. It is an administrative measure within the subcommittee path, not a challenge to a decision on the merits.
The Instructions empower the subcommittee to transfer the file after the Directorate of Martyrs of Victims consents. It is not enough to carry a bundle of documents without that path.
The text speaks of transferring the file to the governorate where the family of the martyr, missing person or kidnap victim lives. Anything outside that case needs another basis; the text is not widened without justification.
The text does not provide for the period to be stayed. It is counted from notification, and care is taken to file the objection in time even if the file is in transit between two governorates.
Injury compensation under Law No. 20 of 2009: claims usually go to the sub-committee, which examines the incident link and the medical report.
Read →Injured in a terrorist operation and the injury worsened after the compensation decision? When to request reconsideration and what papers it takes.
Read →General practical scenarios under Law 20 of 2009, as amended: missing documents, a deed of death, a timely objection, a transfer, and payment priority.
Read →