Law Office ofAli Barakat
Recording a company with the Companies Registrar

The evidential force of electronic contracts and signatures for companies

In briefElectronic Signature and Electronic Transactions Law No. 78 of 2012 gives an electronic signature, if its conditions are met, the same evidential force as a handwritten signature in civil, commercial and administrative transactions. It applies to legal persons, including companies, within the scope of article 3, with excluded matters. This page is the evidential force of a company's electronic dealings. It is not a page on drafting a contract, and it is not a review of a contract drawn up in two languages.

A company's dealings by electronic means are read from Electronic Signature and Electronic Transactions Law No. 78 of 2012, and from article 223 of the Companies Law in dealings before the Registrar. The wording of a bargain is prepared on the contract-drafting page. A document written in two languages is reviewed on its page. The office takes the question from its seat in Baghdad, al-Yarmouk.

Scope and exclusions

The Law applies to electronic transactions carried out by natural or legal persons, to transactions the parties agree to carry out by electronic means, and to electronic securities and commercial papers, under article 3, first paragraph. A legal person falls within the definition of the signatory: the holder of signature-creation data who signs the electronic document for that person, or for a person whom the signatory represents, under article 1. The Minister, for the purposes of this Law, is the Minister of Communications, and a certification-service provider is a legal person licensed to issue certificates authenticating an electronic signature.

Article 3, second paragraph, takes certain matters out of the Law. Among them are personal-status questions, the making or later amendment of a will or a waqf, and dealings that transfer immovable property — including a power of attorney for that purpose, a title deed, or the creation of a real right — while a lease of that property remains inside the Law. Also excluded are dealings for which a statute imposes a special form, what takes place in court (procedure, notices, summonses, search or arrest orders, and judgments), and a document that a statute requires a notary public to authenticate. If a company's dealing falls within one of these exclusions, the evidential force of this Law is not relied on in that respect.

The Law aims to provide a framework for the use of electronic means, to give legal evidential force to electronic transactions and signatures and to regulate their rules, and to strengthen confidence in their correctness and integrity, under article 2.

The force of the signature and of the document

An electronic signature is treated as valid and as issued by the signatory if means are available to identify the signatory and to indicate that signatory's agreement to what is stated in the electronic document, and according to the agreement between the signatory and the addressee on how the electronic transaction is to be carried out, under article 4, first paragraph. In civil, commercial and administrative dealings, an electronic signature is given the proving force of a signature in ink once the conditions in article 5 have been observed in making it, under article 4, second paragraph. That force arises in evidence when a certification-service provider has certified the signature and all of the following are present: a link to that signatory only; exclusive control of the electronic medium by that signatory; the possibility of detecting any later change; and creation under procedures laid down by the Ministry of Communications in instructions of the Minister, under article 5.

Electronic commercial and financial papers have the same evidential force as their paper counterparts unless the law provides otherwise, and the rules on paper instruments apply to them in a manner consistent with this Law, under article 23. That provision is read with the page on bills of exchange and promissory notes, without extending the scope of article 3 to an excluded matter.

Suspension of a certificate, and dealings before the Registrar

The licensed provider is bound to suspend a certification certificate at once at the signatory's request, and may suspend it if it appears that it has been used for an unlawful purpose or that the information it contains has changed, and must inform the signatory at once, under article 11. The signatory or a third party may challenge the decision to suspend from the date it is published in the electronic register. The official text uses a generic description of the competent court. Licensed providers are to supply the company, or a court, with such reports as are requested about their activity, while signature data remain confidential except for the purpose for which they were provided, under article 12, without repeating a description of a court.

Dealings before the Registrar of Companies may be carried out by electronic circulation within the limits of article 223, as set out on electronic registration. The evidential force of a signature does not stand in for the Registrar's authentication where the Companies Law requires it, or for the exclusions in article 3 above.

The reading is followed from Baghdad, al-Yarmouk.

Legal basis and sources

  1. Electronic Signature and Electronic Transactions Law No. 78 of 2012
  2. Companies Law No. 21 of 1997, article 223

Frequently asked questions

How does the evidential force of electronic dealings differ from preparing a contract?

This page is the evidential force of a company's electronic dealings within the scope of Law No. 78 of 2012. Preparing the wording is a separate path in the contract-drafting practice area.

When does the evidential force of this Law not apply to a company's dealing?

If the dealing falls within a matter excluded by article 3, second paragraph, including the disposal of immovable property other than its lease, a document that must be notarised by a notary public, and court procedures.

Which body hears a challenge to the suspension of a certification certificate?

Article 11 allows the signatory or a third party to challenge the decision to suspend. The text does not name the court that hears that challenge.

Always check the text in force and its amendments in the official source.

To ask about your matter